DTAi
  • DTA
    • about DTA
    • work
    • connect
    • collabor8 [link]
  • domus
    • website [link]
  • DTA
    • about DTA
    • work
    • connect
    • collabor8 [link]
  • domus
    • website [link]
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

14/1/2016 3 Comments

The Challenge

By Denis Turco 
Denis is President and Managing Principal of DTA Denis Turco Architect Inc., which he founded in 1995. 
I was inspired to write this post by my recent "rediscovery" of an interview with Charles Eames,  conducted in 1972, entitled "What is Design?". 

​There exists a common misconception that architects always promote formal expression, often at the expense of service. In extreme cases, critics say we are at risk of becoming "useless" to our clients, building users and to society. I believe this perspective is based on a vague, generalized understanding of what we actually do and how we work. What architects do, first and foremost, is solve problems and provide for a need. That will never be irrelevant.
 
SO WHERE IS THE DISCONNECT?
The mass media usually provides a presentation of architecture that is primarily aesthetic, often portraying the work of world-renowned “​starchitects” working for clients that are more interested in achieving a visual “wow" factor than they are concerned about improving efficiency, safety or in making buildings that are a functional and sustainable place for people to live, work and visit. Sometimes this is very successful for a client or a community (For example, after the huge success of Frank Gehry's design for the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain, critics began referring to the economic and cultural revitalization of cities through iconic, innovative architecture as the "Bilbao effect"). They talk about design theory and present the work as an esoteric, sculptural finished product. The effect of this sort of exposure has created what has often been described as the "starchitect complex". MARKETING OVER SERVICE.

Big "A" architecture, however, still needs to manage client and user requirements- all while making an artistic and, often, a discursive statement that contributes positively to our society. This isn't an easy achievement, especially if the purse-strings are held by a client on a fixed budget. Convincing a client that a formal expression is worth the expense is a talent in and of itself. Being formally expressive on a budget is an art- even if it isn't always successful. But is it even necessary? Do architects always promote formal expression at the expense of service? And what about "mundane" requirements such as programme and function? The short answer is No. Of course not.

As we certainly do in our own studio, I believe the vast majority of architects take user and client needs and requirements very seriously, and always do their best to satisfy these parameters above all else. We empathize and we listen. We are well versed in building technology, construction methods, materials, contracts, zoning parameters, building codes, engineering systems and a plethora of other things. This was clear to Vitruvius over 2,000 years ago, when he wrote De architectura. Yet, the public perception continues to often be one that sees the architect as self-serving megalomaniac that is out of touch with the needs of people. This brings me back to the disconnect...

THIS is our challenge, a "call to action" if you will: How do we, as a profession, work at repairing this misguided perception? I believe the answer lies in "process over marketing". This is what we do, and this is what we are good at. 

ARCITECTURE IS, ABOVE ALL, A SERVICE WITH A PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCESS.
​

That we strive to create beautiful, sustainable and functional buildings should be a given. Instead, amongst everything else, we should promote the value of our service. Our client's satisfaction should be lauded; ​Value engineering should be praised; Contributions to the public and private realms should be celebrated. Our process should define us. SERVICE OVER MARKETING.
Best known for furniture design, architect and designers Charles Eames (1907–1978) and Ray Kaiser Eames (1912-1988) got it right. They created timeless, beautiful and functional products (and buildings) with their simple process.​
Picture
This 1969 Design Diagram gives insight into how Charles and Ray Eames viewed the design process.
I was a recent architecture school graduate in the early 1990s, when I first came across the Charles Eames interview. The following excerpts are as understated as his designs, and as clear as they are brief.

Q: What is your definition of “Design”?
A: One could describe Design as a plan for arranging elements to accomplish a particular purpose.

Q: Is Design an expression of art?
A: I would rather say it’s an expression of purpose. It may, if it is good enough, later be judged as art.

Q: What are the boundaries of Design?
A: What are the boundaries of problems?

Q: Is Design a discipline that concerns itself with only one part of the environment?
A: No.


Q: Is it a method of general expression?
A: No, it is a method of action.

Q: Is Design a creation of an individual?
A: No, because to be realistic one must always recognize the influence of those that have gone before.

Q: Is there a Design ethic?
A: There are always Design constraints, and these often imply an ethic.

Q: Does Design imply the idea of products that are necessarily useful?
A: Yes, even though the use might be very subtle.

Q: Is it able to cooperate in the creation of works reserved solely for pleasure?
A: Who would say that pleasure is not useful?

Q: Ought form to derive from the analysis of function?
A: The great risk here is that the analysis may be incomplete.

Q: Can the computer substitute for the Designer?
A: Probably, in some special cases, but usually the computer is an aid to the Designer.

Q: Does the creation of Design admit constraint?
A: Design depends largely on constraints.

Q: What constraints?
A: The sum of all constraints. Here is one of the few effective keys to the Design problem: The ability of the Designer to recognize as many of the constraints as possible. His willingness and enthusiasm for working within these constraints- constraints of price, of size, of strength, of balance, of surface, of time, and so forth. Each problem has its own peculiar list.

Q: Does Design obey laws?
A: Aren’t constraints enough?

Q: Are there tendencies and schools in Design?
A: Yes, but these are more a measure of human limitations than of ideals.

Q: Ought Design to tend towards the ephemeral or towards permanence?
A: Those needs and Designs that have a more universal quality tend toward relative permanence.

Q: To whom does Design address itself: to the greatest number? to the specialists or the enlightened amateur? to a privileged social class?
A: Design addresses itself to the need.

Q: Have you been forced to accept compromises?
A: I don’t remember ever being forced to accept compromises, but I have willingly accepted constraints.

Q: What do you feel is the primary condition for the practice of Design and for its propagation?
A: The recognition of need.

Q: What is the future of Design?
A: (No answer)
3 Comments

9/11/2015 0 Comments

20 years | 1995-2015

Picture
This November,  D T A  celebrates its 20th anniversary. A sincerest thank you to all of our valued clients, colleagues, and team members across these 20 years!

D T A was launched in November, 1995 by Denis Turco as a design-build company with a commitment to excellent client service and thoughtful design. Since its inception, our office has operated as a collaborative studio where creative innovation is encouraged. This experience in building and development planning was fused with our passion for our work, resulting in the technical competence, cost control and the application of integrated design solutions that we offer today.

Our construction and real estate arm was incorporated in 2003 as a distinct, separate real estate development company, Domus Pacific Group. With decades of experience in property investment, finance and development design and management, Domus Pacific continues to focus on commercial, residential and investment properties in the Greater Vancouver area and the Okanagan.

D T A | DENIS TURCO ARCHITECT | INC. is a Vancouver-based studio providing architectural, planning and management services to clients in both the private and public sectors. 
0 Comments

19/3/2014 4 Comments

Why is passive design important? 

By Sakshi Misra
Building Technologist & Designer, DTA Denis Turco Architect Inc.

As architects, we can determine the order and shape of our built environment; but equally important, or perhaps even more important, is our impact on the planet as a result of that order and shape. As our planet's natural resources are depleting, it is becoming increasingly important to consider how the needs of the future generations will be fulfilled. Sustainable design is the practice of increasing the efficiency with which the built environment consumes energy, water and materials and reducing the environment impacts of the built environment over its life cycle. One way of achieving this is by employing passive design strategies which rely on natural heating, cooling and day-lighting to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and electricity. 

Sustainability and passive design strategies played a critical role in my post secondary education. From studying climatic conditions, materials, solar heating and natural ventilation, I learned the importance of extending the design beyond the walls of a building and understanding the impacts on the context. Hours of research, case studies and intense discussions informed and guided many of the design decisions for my projects. In spite of my studies, it took one single moment to fully understand the impact of successful passive design: my first visit to Taj Mahal.
Picture
Gateway entrance to the complex.
Picture
View of the Taj from the Gateway entrance.

It was mid-June, the peak of summer in India. The four hour drive from Delhi to Agra had started off as cool and pleasant, but the excitement had worn off by noon as the temperature had reached 48°C. Of course, the marvel and beauty in the architecture of the ancient mausoleum was a sight to behold, but unfortunately the unbearable heat prevented me from truly appreciating it. The tour around the complex of gardens under the blazing sun had left me feeling faint. As we made our way into the main chamber of the tomb, I wished only for cold water and shade. The chamber was indeed shaded, but it was also very crowded and smelled of sweat, which made the atmosphere almost as stifling as the heat outside. Walking around the tomb near the centre, I came to a sudden stop as I experienced a cool breeze.

I remember looking around to find the source of the breeze, in the hopes of standing closer to the fan. My guide laughingly told me this was the beauty of the Taj; because even on a still, hot day, the interior of the chamber was kept naturally cool and ventilated. The careful placement and design of the windows created a funnel effect for the outside air. The shape of the openings, with a larger opening on the exterior and a smaller opening on the interior face of the wall, increased the air flow to fully ventilate the interior. The jali, stone latticed screens, in each opening, added to the Venturi effect by creating even smaller openings for airflow. The water channels and fountains integrated in the complex and the Yamuna River north of the Taj further cooled the air as it entered the chamber, and the double wall construction achieved thermal cooling for the interior. The sounds and smells in that chamber didn’t matter as I stood rooted to the spot, absorbing as much of the breeze as I could. A few things had become very clear to me at that point: the importance of basic human comfort; how minimal human comfort actually is; and the full impact of passive strategies.
Picture
Site Diagram: 1. The Moonlight Garden to the north of the Yamuna River, 2. Terrace area (Tomb, Mosque), 3. Charbagh (The Gardens), 4. Gateway, attendant accommodations and other tombs, 5. Taj Ganji (The Bazaar).
[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Taj_site_plan.png]

Until that moment in the chamber, it really hadn't mattered that I was looking at an architectural masterpiece of the world, because my mind and body had been too overwhelmed by the heat and I was struggling to stay upright! This also led me to reflect on how it really doesn't take much to make ourselves comfortable, and perhaps we have spoiled our bodies and minds by creating such controlled environments that may be too comfortable, as we become more and more dependent on technology. We have become so accustomed to the controlled environments inside the buildings that we forget that opening or closing a window may be all that’s needed to bring sufficient comfort. This active participation and interaction between the building and the occupant is the result of passive design and creates a sense of awareness of both the interior and exterior environments. It is quite amazing to think that the Taj Mahal achieved centuries ago what we struggle with today: how our environment’s natural resources can be harnessed and used to enrich our experiences. It is proof that even as we advance in technology and innovation, it’s important to look back and learn from our past.

I find vernacular architecture, architecture indigenous to a specific time or place, quite inspiring. Tipis, igloos and mud houses are only a few examples, and all were (and still are!) successful in that time and place because they efficiently fulfilled the needs of the users with the most economical use of local materials. And it was this specificity to each physical context that created a symbiotic relationship between man, land and building. Over time, globalization has made it possible to transport any material and technology to any corner of the world, but the relationship between user, building and context has deteriorated. 
Picture
Picture
Passive strategies in Mughal architecture: Ventilation openings located high in the structure to allow hot rising air to exit as cool air enters from openings below; Jalis, stone latticed screens, used as architectural decoration and to allow for natural ventilation.

I attended a lecture recently by Rahul Mehrotra, who is a practising architect and urban planner in India, as well as a professor at Harvard University. He sees glass towers as "architecture of impatient capitalism", because many cities considered models of capitalism - like Dubai, Shanghai and Singapore - are under strict governments that can immediately prepare the ground to collect the most capital for minimum effort. This is why, he claims, towers with glass curtain cladding (being the quickest and easiest construction option), have become the symbol of "global capitalism" and an expression of modernity. Along with sustainability, social and cultural needs and values play a huge role in Mehrotra's design solutions. He gave fine examples of inappropriate use of materials and their repercussions: During some political unrest earlier this year in South India, glass buildings could be equipped with fine nets to protect them from stones thrown in case of riots. These were actual systems that hooked onto the building – and were even available in different colours, imagine that! Similarly, the climatic conditions in India are simply not ideal for tall glass towers. Although the building may be up and functioning quickly, the amount of money and effort put into the installation, operation and maintenance of blinds and air conditioning systems behind the glass is something that is often overlooked.

While explaining one of his projects in India, Mehrotra talked briefly about the interesting ways certain materials weather and develop patinas over time, and one can spend a considerable amount of time studying the effects of time and climate on these materials. He then laughed as he added that, nowadays, the discussion around the table is less about weathering and more about weatherproofing buildings. 

While advancement is right, and even essential in its own place, it's also important to remember the fundamentals; like the value of a cool breeze on a hot summer day. 
4 Comments

18/2/2014 5 Comments

So You Want to Build a Restaurant? (An Architect’s Perspective)

By Denis Turco 
Denis is President and Managing Principal of DTA Denis Turco Architect Inc., which he founded in 1995. 

Maybe you have worked your way up through the industry, or you've decided that the culinary world is your calling. Perhaps you've determined that it's a great business opportunity. Whatever the inspiration, you have a vision, and you've decided to take the entrepreneurial leap. You are going to open your own restaurant!

Congratulations, you are about to embark on a unique venture that allows you to combine business acumen and management skills with creativity and community interaction. It can, at once, be satisfying, challenging and, sometimes, lucrative. It can be an exciting world, in which some restaurateurs and chefs go on to gain celebrity status.

Unfortunately, it is also a difficult world of long hours, and one in which start-ups have some of the highest failure rates of any industry sector. While many fail because they simply cannot attract enough customers (the many reasons include: uninspiring concept, poor management, bad business decisions, lousy location or, simply, awful food!), many of them fail because- right up front- they are not aware of the many pitfalls and challenges that come with building a restaurant.

I’m an architect. I’m not a restaurant owner, a financial advisor, a lawyer, an accountant or a business coach. I'm not even a good cook. I am, however, intimately familiar with the design and construction of food service establishments, ranging from kiosks in shopping mall food courts to 300+ seat family restaurants. My clients, over the last 25 years, have included leading corporate “chain” restaurants, neighbourhood pub owners, experienced restaurateurs and seasoned hospitality professionals. I’ve learned a lot; not just about the architecture of restaurants, but about the process of building one. 
​I’m hoping to direct my architect's perspective at the budding restaurateur, those of you that are considering your first restaurant.
Your restaurant business is, most likely, going to be a tenant in an existing building or shopping centre, or a conversion of an existing space. For you, I have some practical pointers:

>> Have a solid, realistic business plan… and take that to the bank!

It’s OK to have big dreams and high expectations. Without them, where would the motivation come from? However, far too often, potential restaurant owners have a pro forma based on optimism and not reality. While I’m not going to talk about how to finance your proposed venture, or lease rates (what is the value of location, location, location?), I can tell you that a business plan is about much more than just money.

Most typical revenue projections allow for $12-30,000 per seat; however, for the new restaurant owner, predicting this figure is really a shot in the dark. Make sure your plan allows you to sustain your business for an extended period, at the lower end of the spectrum. It often takes a year or more for a new restaurant to take hold.

>> Fully understand your legal and financial rights and obligations - and liability exposure!

Invest up front in some solid legal and accounting advice before you commit yourself to your ideas, your lease and to others. For example, how will you structure your business venture? Do you need a corporation? What are the tax implications? If you have partners, have you legally documented your relationship? What are some leasing pitfalls to avoid? Can you legally do what you are hoping to do and does it really make financial sense? Etc., etc ... It will buy you piece of mind, guide you along the way, it may avoid long delays and it could save you a fortune in the future.  
Picture
Picture
>> Make sure that your plan reflects an attainable schedule.

Pre-opening timelines are by far the most overlooked- and underestimated- part of any restaurant’s business plan.  
Not correctly budgeting for the time and effort it takes to design and construct a restaurant is a pitfall that affects the bottom line before the first customer enters the door. And remember, leasing incentives are rarely geared towards the restaurant tenant. Three month's free rent is rarely enough until you open your doors to your first customers. Talk to a good architect early, before you might commit to an unrealistic schedule, and see how the design, permitting and construction process will affect you.

Design: Of course design costs money, but it also takes time… much more time than most people realize. There are architects, designers, various engineers, specialty consultants, municipal interaction and a multitude of coordination requirements that need to be considered. The entire design process, from initial sketches to building permit application, can take from several weeks to many months, depending on the complexity of the project and the individual restaurant owners’ goals and objectives. If a Development Permit or Rezoning is required, that can add on even more months, as there are specific submittal and presentation requirements that need to be dealt with before detailed technical documents are prepared for building permit application. Even people seasoned in the restaurant business can underestimate the consequences of the design schedule, especially if they have no experience building a new restaurant, or if they are upgrading to a more complex operation.

Permits: Another aspect that is often underestimated is the time it takes to actually get a permit. Permitting for restaurants is a complicated process- there is the task of obtaining a building permit (BP), yes, but there are also health approvals, liquor licensing, patio permits and, as noted above, there may also be the need for a development permit (DP) or even rezoning. A DP may be required if you: 
  • Are planning to alter the use of an existing space (for example, your proposed space used to be a retail store, a clinic or an office);
  • Are making changes to the exterior of an existing building (sometimes that even includes just signage or replacing windows);
  • Construct a new stand-alone building or, potentially, if you are the first tenant in a new base building.
Even a “simple” tenant improvement could take up to 8 weeks from the time of application to when a building permit is issued by the municipal authority. A development permit can add on another month or two (sometimes it can run concurrently). A rezoning, depending on the issues, may result in public hearings and council meetings- easily adding on several more months.
A new building, or a substantial renovation, can result in the requirement for municipal service upgrades and municipal engineering review during the permit process. This can add on several weeks to the overall BP process, and some jurisdictions are notoriously slow.

Construction: “On time, on budget”… that cliché saying simply does not apply to the restaurant industry; at least, not in the strictest sense. “On time” has to allow a myriad of expected, but unknown, factors that will appear during construction.  I have never, in over 20 years, seen a restaurant constructed that didn’t incur schedule changes due to unforeseen building conditions, equipment and material procurement delays or most often, believe it or not, owner design changes during construction. It’s imperative that owners make up their mind and stick to it. Changes during construction, unless absolutely necessary, should be avoided as they cost money and (more importantly) delay the project. Get the place open and save that great last minute idea for next time or the next location.
Except for the most simple of jobs (usually light makeovers to existing restaurants), most small tenant improvements will take from 6 weeks to 2 months.  Larger, more complicated tenant improvements can take up to 4 to 5 months. A new, free-standing building could take double that to completion.

Hand-over and Testing: A construction schedule should consider a period for staff training, operations testing and deficiency clean-up prior to opening to the public. There should also be a contingency factor built in for inevitable hurdles.  An ideal time for this is about two or three weeks, although you might get away with one week if necessary. The bottom line is that you will need final occupancy well prior to opening, so that you can occupy the premises for staff training and final touch-ups. The last thing you want to do is open up shop with unprepared staff.
​
As you can see, from concept to reality can take a long time. Consider the cost and time implications when you sign your lease, purchase your property or decide to renovate. Talk to an architect and become aware of the schedule so your results don’t fall short of your expectations.
Picture
Picture
>> More than anything: Know your budget!!!

Your budget must allow for a myriad of things and, when it comes to restaurants, most business plans fall short on both soft costs and hard costs. Owners will often rely on a realtor or leasing agent anxious to close the deal, without confirming actual costs. This can come as a surprise so it’s best to be aware of all potential costs up front. 

>> Determine how much you will need, and make sure you have the necessary funds at your disposal! 

Often overlooked or underestimated are the following:

Design Fees: As mentioned above, restaurants are specialty buildings that require specialty consultants. These include architects (required by law for any assembly building, no matter how small), mechanical engineers for the heating, cooling, ventilation, plumbing and sprinkler components, and electrical engineers for lighting and power requirements. Most projects also utilize the services of interior designers, audio consultants and kitchen equipment consultants. New buildings and substantial alterations will also require the services of a structural engineer and a geotechnical/ soils engineer. Assuming there are no environmental (hazardous materials) concerns, these are the players you will need and their fees will range somewhere between 8 and 15% of construction cost, depending on the size and complexity of the project. For a new tenant improvement, budget between $60 to $120,000 for total design fees.

Marketing Fees: A communications company can coordinate the image of your restaurant business to the public. I believe this extends to the image that the building exterior and interior conveys. For this reason, it’s important to have a brand image conceptualized that can be coordinated with the architectural design. Signage, graphics, menus, advertising and general PR can add up. Budget accordingly, depending on your needs.

Pre-Construction Expenses: As noted, permit fees will be necessary at the time of application and a balance prior to permit issuance. Again, this varies depending on the size and scope of the project, and whether development permit, rezoning or variances are required. For new development, development cost charges may also be payable to the City, which can reach the tens of thousands of dollars. Letters of Credit may also be required, for the cost of offsite service upgrades (see above) and landscape work. These too, can total tens of thousands of dollars. For a simple tenant improvement restaurant, budget about $6,000 for BP.

Cost of Construction: It’s by far the largest single expense most restaurant owners will face, and it’s often underestimated. Talking to a contractor early on is useful, but it’s impossible for them to cost a project without detailed technical documents that are used to receive bids. Having said that, you will need to budget something for the cost, which can be all over the map.
​
This is why you should talk to an experienced architect first- right up front- one that can take your ideas, look at the proposed location to determine probable building requirements and potential upgrades, prepare an outline of requirements and help you and a contractor determine a preliminary construction budget. Because the initial budget is preliminary, and dependent on the ultimate level of finishes, detailing, quality of materials and equipment, not to mention any structural and life safety upgrades that may be required in tenant improvements, as well as potential unknowns, most project budgets should carry a 10 to 15% contingency at the early stages.

And then there’s that FF&E that can range from very little to enough to buy a small nation. FF&E is typically a separate cost item from hard construction, which does normally include all “back of house” costs such as kitchen equipment, staff rooms and washrooms. Although some come in significantly under and others much more, for a straight-forward restaurant a construction budget of $250 to $350 per sf of leasable space is the norm.

Operating capital: Plan on having 9 to 12 months of operating capital from the start. It’s amazing how quickly expenditures add up and how much time it takes for a new place to take root and get regular customers. And remember, revenues usually take a dip after the initial opening excitement! The honeymoon does not always last forever, so budget wisely.

>> Hire good people!

This adage applies to the design consultants and contractors you hire, just as it will to the staff and management of your operation. A restaurant is a specialty building, and designing it is also a specialty. The Architectural Institute of BCclassifies it as a “complex” building type, above “advanced” and just below “specialized” buildings such as medical research, scientific and hospital buildings.
Naturally, you will want to start with an architect. Hire one with experience in the design of restaurants (and I can recommend a really good one, if you ask). If an interior designer is used (not all architects offer interior design services), the same applies. Most of all, I can’t stress enough the value of an experienced mechanical engineer- one who understands the nuances and special requirements of restaurants and commercial kitchens.

You will probably want to hire a good marketing and communications team. A successful restaurant is as much about branding as it is about food and service. A well defined brand should also be coordinated with the building design. Marketing should not to be taken lightly; after all, you are starting a people business and it will be important to communicate to potential customers.

Hire a good contractor or construction manager with experience, and a good track record, building restaurants at the scale of your restaurant (for example, a small tenant improvement with a tight timeline vs. a new building with a tight timeline… they always have tight timelines!). Do not do it yourself. You are a restaurateur, not a contractor; and even if you are handy swinging a hammer and laying tiles, you have much more important things to do.

>> Marketing 101: Brand your restaurant.

A strong brand will create an identity for the restaurant.  It will tell potential customers what your restaurant is all about and sets it apart from its competitors. It creates a corporate “personality”. When done properly, a brand gives visual and emotional cues to potential customers. An effective restaurant brand extends across all parts of the business, from the architecture to interior design and décor, to marketing materials and menus. Developing a brand and using it to your advantage can give your business a competitive edge. It’s especially critical for those of you envisioning multiple locations.

It may make sense to hire a firm that can assist you with marketing analytics. As restaurants are increasingly faced with daunting challenges in a progressively crowded marketplace, customer analytics can help your brand stand out. Know your customer. A sharper perspective of your core customer can be used, not only to drive real estate site location decisions, but for targeted marketing, promotions and other elements of the overall brand concept.

If the food is good, the brand will allow customers to remember you and to recommend the restaurant.

>> Know your competition.

Surprising to some, there is a great deal of camaraderie in the restaurant industry. Get out there and talk to your competition; see what they’re up to and do your own “hands on” research. If you look at them as allies, you will find that they will offer a lot of free advice. After all, the restaurant world is also a small world. You might as well learn to get along.

>> Have fun at it!

View my profile on LinkedIn
5 Comments

    Archives

    January 2016
    November 2015
    March 2014
    February 2014

    Categories

    All Architect Architecture Charles Eames Construction Design Design Process Hospitality Human Comfort Mughal Architecture Passive Design Restaurant Sustainable Design Taj Mahal Vernacular Architecture

    RSS Feed

* D T A | practices architecture in British Columbia as DENIS TURCO ARCHITECT INC., in Alberta and Manitoba [deactivated] as DENIS TURCO ARCHITECT and Washington State as DENIS TURCO ARCHITECT AIA.

Copyright © D T A | DENIS TURCO ARCHITECT | INC. 2017-2022. All Rights Reserved [Credits].